Will Deener of the Dallas Morning News wrote a meandering and condescending opinion piece on April 19, lamenting that due to a recent bad retail experience, there’s a lot of unmotivated workers in the workforce that don’t care about their jobs. The problem is that he’s lying. The whole op-ed is based in lies.
“Conversation has to include not only what you think, but what you routinely do. Nowthat would be an interesting conversation about race–a difficult one that doesn’t allow for self-congratulations, but that might be more useful in the long run.— Eric Sherman, Inc.com, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz Trips Over Race
Progressivism can’t fuel the absurd notion race–especially when it comes to African-Americans, is divisive. Race is culture, race is community and our ability to openly and thoughtfully solve challenges in every community must be rooted in an acceptance of diversity in all its forms, be it ethnic, religious, gender, or geographical.–Lauren Brown Jarvis, Huffington Post, 6/26/2013
Part of the reason why I’ve been so frustrated with the progressive movement over the years is because of the proclivity of some people within it to act as if race isn’t important–not as important as matters of class, matters of equality, or even at all. I believe it is a blind spot towards progress that we’d like to achieve, generally. And I think that most progressives, when aware of this problem, can be reasoned with.
But the people within the movement that frustrate me the most are the ones who take criticism on race matters, and simply dismiss it out of hand. Or, worse: they recycle the same racist rhetoric that conservatives use, to call those people “racist”, “divisive”, and otherwise. It’s frustrating, because (according to them) progressives are (supposedly) better than conservatives on matters of race, and yet believe all the same that minorities ought to couch their criticism of the movement because we’re “on the same team.”
Were I to be unfair, and judge simply by the few examples I’ve seen this past week, then I’d have to cast doubt. I know better. I know this is merely a segment of a larger coalition. But it must be called out, because it is still damaging and insulting. Continue reading
The interview with Mathew Klickstein here was just…all over the place. I read it as very condescending to women, to minorities, and to those who have brains. Next to the definition of “dudebro” should be a photo of Mathew Klickstein and his hat and beard. This dude needs to get the entire fuck out my face.
Originally posted on Flavorwire:
There is no era of television that inspires such a pure, fervent nostalgia as the Golden Age of Nickelodeon. During the late ’80s and early ’90s, the network aired wonderful and strange series that changed the world of children’s entertainment. This Thursday, New York Super Week will throw a “Nite of Nickelodeon Nostalgic Nonsense!” at Hammerstein Ballroom to celebrate these timeless shows with actor appearances, performances by Polaris (of Pete & Pete fame) and the duo behind Doug’s The Beets (Fred Newman and Dan Sawyer), and more. Mathew Klickstein, the event’s moderator and author of SLIMED! An Oral History of Nickelodeon’s Golden Age, spoke to Flavorwire about the event, our persistent love for this era, and why he believes Nickelodeon’s desire to diversify its programming is “exploitive and predatory.”
View original 3,206 more words
Well, you could have always said “No thanks,” Tavis. Continue reading